@mark Yes I realize the output from the computer is 2 channel unbalanced (unless using a DAC to sum and balance) but I had misunderstood you completel...

@mark Your observations seem to imply, from a compatibility standpoint (balanced vs unbalanced connections), that the Culbert processor is more adapt ...

I'm just the opposite, I'd prefer the balanced outputs as that's what the Rangemaster calls for, this allowing a direct connection. I still presume...

I can only guess this 2015 thread comment had been made by Carl Blare, just a guess/p>

Hey... There were two versions, the updated one in 2013, HBs 2 page review is in my opinion is first rate, although I'm sure page 2 will get the most ...

There actually has, though perhaps not step-by-step here, but I recall videos and illustrated webpages showing how to do it. It requires an ocyliscope...

There's also a general consensus that asymmetrical processing capability, while advantageous, doesn't really make enough of real dramatic difference t...

@artisan-radio I had recently linked to the thread where Tim talked about the 125% peaks in another post. And your right, Tim had said that here: H...

Mark, You surprise me.. I thought you abandoned use of the Cuthbert processor because you were dissatisfied with some kind of "clicking" and the begin...

I don't know but it's always been my understanding the Rangemaster is the only that's even one capable of modulating 125% positive peaks and I think i...

Not that I think anyone cares, but technically that is against the rules as it breaks both of the stipulations which allows use of call letters for p...

@mark In the comments of the first video someone asked:Looks like a well set up station. What distance did you end up getting?To which he replied:Abou...