Home › Forums › temp › Kansas Ham Issued $10,000 Fine for Operation of Unlicensed Broadcast Station › The Context is Still Out
Total posts : 45366
The Kansas Ham who was fined for his FM operation is not a member of part15.us and did not claim to be operating under the part 15 rules.
Therefore the incident, while interesting to all part 15 members, does not reflect on us whatsoever.
This question has a prosecutorial tone…
“Wouldn’t most, reasonable people accept the field strength measurements of the FCC given in their publicly-released Part 15 NOUOs issued to unlicensed AM/FM band operators as sufficient proof that such installations were non-compliant with Part 15?”
It refers to “Part 15 NOUOs” which have not been entered into evidence anywhere in this discussion. “Reasonable people” prefer their subject doesn’t get distorted into false avenues of fault finding.