Total posts : 45366
Interpretation is as vast as individuals on the planet. Each has their own they stick with. Perfectly fine for each individual. But not perfectly fine for everyone. If it was perfectly fine for everyone..aka one blanket covers all, then what is the purpose of discussion, debate, discovery and learning, much less open forums like this one?
It is the mission of each of us to share what we know and help others. Everyone here that has participated in this thread has done just that. It is the perfect example of diverseness in this field, and is a gold mine of information. Each member is a contributor…no matter how complex or how simple the advice is. It is that information that is important, not what one individual believes is the right interpretation or the other. It is up to each one who is taking in this information to sort it out for themselves and learn from the process.
Maybe I am just too old school…or stuck in the old ways or something. But I will state this for the record….it is the old school stuff that paved the way for the new stuff, without that established path, there would not be any path at all. It would be starting from the beginning all over again.
As new stuff comes about, new paths are created for even newer things. Its called progress. Its called advancement. But even with advancement there is always that back reference to turn to..aka a starting point.
With the clustering/spreading/repeating, all of the ideas presented here are worthwhile to investigate and experiment with. The more ways to do a thing means the better chances of accomplishing something. Isn’t that the entire point?