Total posts : 45366
Detractions aside, what I find is a one-sided conclusion put forward by a self-proclaimed technician with no actual part 15 practice but only hear-say theory aimed at discrediting a significant transmitter and its manufacturer together with all of the products defenders.
Line up with the several anti-part 15ers who nip at the heels of the hobby.
Confess finally what the anti-part 15ers hope ultimately to achieve and on who’s behalf?
