• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Field Strength Meas...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Field Strength Measurement

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 18 years ago
7 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
600 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Part 15 operation on frequencies 1710KHz and above requires field strength measurements.

From 1705KHz to 30MHz a measurement at a distance of 30 meters is required;

Part 15 operation on frequencies 1710KHz and above requires field strength measurements.

From 1705KHz to 30MHz a measurement at a distance of 30 meters is required;

FM band must be measured at a distance of 3 meters.

What is the brand name and description of the device needed for making such low power field strength measurements?


 
Posted : 03/11/2008 5:38 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Some say that's one of the reasons the "3 meter/100mW" rule was adopted for the AM band (pre-expanded band of 550 KHz - 1610 KHz)

Certified, around $3,000
http://www.emctd.com

Not certified, around $300
http://www.detectortechnologies.com/store/detail.aspx?ID=28

And it is said that the certified meter should be operated by an engineer for best results. Bigger cities might have service firms that could be hired for this, otherwise, I don't know.


 
Posted : 03/11/2008 6:37 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That's far more than I knew before. Appreciate it.


 
Posted : 03/11/2008 10:25 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Neither of the field strength meters mentioned have enough sensitivity to be useful for Part 15. To get a certified instrument with enough sensitivity, you have to spend a lot more bucks.


 
Posted : 04/11/2008 9:56 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hello Ermi Roos

Then what are those more expensive devices by brand name and description? If I'm ever rich I'd tinker with that kind of dis-proportional measurement.


 
Posted : 06/11/2008 3:53 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The FCC does not have that either. Don't let the trolls out here scare you. Most of the time the FCC won't even pick up the gas for the guys and gals that work for them. The FCC uses for AM, that same FSM that's been used for years. If you need references, I can supply them 🙂

Here's something newer: http://www.ztechnology.com/pdf/AMTesting.pdf

These guys are lookin at 30,000uV/M on AM rather than your piss weak AM Part 15 signal.


 
Posted : 06/11/2008 4:23 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

This instrument may be the one that was neant when referring to the "old" equipment used by the FCC. It is still available, and has a sensitivity of 10 uV/m, which is nominally enough for measuring Section 15.209 signal levels. Unfortunately, the 15.209 (or 15.223) limits are usually lower than the AM BCB background noise in urban areas.

The price is more than twice that of the $3000 instrument mentioned previously. This instrument will not work at FM frequencies.

Added Note:

By the way, you may be wondering what good a field strength meter is if it is not capable of measuring field strength, not because of a lack of sensitivity, but because of excessive background noise. The real question is: what good are transmitters that comply with 15.209, 15.221, or 15.223 (for 1710 kHz)? Through my own experiments with such devices, I found that the range in an urban area is 15-20 feet. If the FCC were to increase these field strength limits by a factor of 10 (something that is not likely to happen), the range would be increased to about 100 feet, which is approximately the distance at which the field strength measurements are supposed to be made.


 
Posted : 07/11/2008 4:18 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,613 Topics
  • 62.8 K Posts
  • 10 Online
  • 2,243 Members
Our newest member: RaphaelKal
Latest Post: Jelly Roll Blues
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    Sounds good.

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    I'd also like at some point to do a show, hosted by mys...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    When I played music that was not in the public domain, ...

    By ArtisanRadio , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    The core concept of Part 15 AM has always been to provi...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Public Domain Radio

    √1 - I guess there's not, but the potential exist, so f...

    By RichPowers , 5 months ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Innovative "Syth-a-Sette" Turns Objects Into Music

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • Mark

    Neil Sedaka dies.

    By Mark 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Elvis AI?

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    CB RADIO: Illinois CBer cited for 'broadcasting' on Channel 19

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

  • RichPowers

    Stamped pits vs organic dyes: CDs vs CD-R

    By RichPowers 5 months ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×