• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Bill DeFelice's Ope...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Bill DeFelice's Open Letter to the FCC concerning Pirates vs Part 15 Operators.

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
12 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
621 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

https://www.hobbybroadcaster.net//fcc-open-letter-march-2016.php

This is in response to the recent FCC comments about pirate radio activity.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 9:47 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I really like the opening paragraph because it gets right to the point of what it's about.

I haven't read the rest of it yet, but plan to do so during the day.

We give an approving nod to Bill for his effort which may benefit us all.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 10:43 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Long post short. isn't he just the "pot" calling the kettle black!!

My station was falsely accused of being a pirate by the person saying legal part 15 stations are being accused of and confused with blatant pirates. He has a lot of nerve to play innocent.

He is guilty of doing just what he says the FCC is doing to legal compliant part 15 stations.

Little does the world know the truth, because where false allegations are made people are banned from defending themselves.

After my being banned, the membership continued to call me insulting names and drew a false conclusion about me to which I could not defend myself to. Wasn't that convenient for the "POT"

Bruce.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 12:11 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Time to let go Mr. Bruce. You will feel better.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 12:22 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

He was doing great until the 2nd to last paragraph.  If you take out the 2nd to last paragraph, it is a great response.  The use of “entitled” was off-putting.  Unless responding to individual inquiries is in Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners O’Rielly and Pai’s job descriptions they have nothing requiring them to respond to Mr. DeFelice.  It is entirely possible the Public Affairs Office (PAO) or, equivalent, at the FCC specifically forbids the sort of response Mr. DeFelice thinks he is entitled to.

 

That aside, his point “law abiding Part 15 radio community as a whole has no desire to be associated with pirate operators” is important.  It is also why the initiative makes me uncomfortable; any phrase such as “I ran X watts in to Y antenna and got Z range” where X and Y will exceed 15.239 limits is admitting intentionally being a pirate.

 

Engineering Radio Blog had a pretty good response to the FCC too:  http://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2016/03/no-this-time-we-really-mean-it/

 

At the end of the day a person who wants a signal on FM will either be in compliance with 15.239 or they will be pirates.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 1:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

As indicated I've read the rest of the letter and commend Bill Hobby for sending it... it's main subject is relevant to part 15 welfare.

The opening paragraph is my favorite part.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 2:44 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I think it was a good letter, but overly wordy.

He really should cut down on the self promotion.  The FCC doesn't care about that.

Throwing in the Jerry Gaule situation was a definite mistake.  There likely was more to that behind the scenes than any of us are aware of, and besides, the FCC isn't going to throw one of their own (that inspector) under the bus.

The basic intent is laudable, and indeed, the FCC does need to distinguish much more clearly in their publicity that there is a class of unlicensed operation that ISN'T piracy.

I just wish that Bill had put himself in the FCC's shoes rather than his (and our) own.  Yes, we all, as Part 15 broadcasters, don't want to be unjustly accused of being pirates.  But that and $5 buys you a latte at Starbucks.

What does mistaking a legal Part 15 broadcaster as a pirate mean for the FCC?  Well, it means increased, unfiltered enforcement calls at a time when their budgets are being cut.  If the FCC clearly delineates what is piracy, and what is not, then these other organizations (as well as the media) can and will act as filters.  It would be in the FCC's best interest to get the word out that Part 15 is NOT piracy.

If he had clearly stated that, the letter would have been a home run.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 2:56 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Probably most of us can agree with and support the statements of those who differentiate unlicensed AM/FM transmit systems that actually comply with Part 15 from such systems that do not -- regardless of the claims of their operators.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 3:29 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I just entered into a Peace Treaty and can't respond fully and righteously to what just got said.

If only I'd delayed that Treaty for 1-minute.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 3:40 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Bruce you can tell the whole story of your fate on our board. IT WON'T BE EDITED!!! Some of this is what I call sensitive dialogue. In the Elite section this cn be talked about with those who don't accuse. Now about that letter yes again part 15 is being put in jeopardy and yet we bicker about trivial stuff like “elite access” lol. We need to get people to realize that the war against part 15 has already been called out. Are we gonna sit and wait and again another hobby estroyed? How many years this time will it take America to get its head out of the sand? Will it be too late? Stay tune to find out. Care to wager? This could be a good betting game.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 10:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

 

 

sigh..


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 11:59 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Ditto to RP


 
Posted : 08/03/2016 10:54 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,740 Topics
  • 63.5 K Posts
  • 51 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Many songs have I heard something other than the actual...

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    RE: 7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    Have you heard this?

    By Mark , 1 day ago

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    Here one I've not seen before. they're $69.50 on eBay, ...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    As far as I'm concerned this article is ridiculous, I d...

    By RichPowers , 2 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Newly Discovered Robert Johnson in Stunning Clarity

    @richpowers Sounds good.

    By Mark , 2 days ago

Recent Topics

  • RichPowers

    Unique AM Transmitter

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    7 Beatles Misheard Lyrics

    By RichPowers 2 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Public Domain Feature Films about Radio

    By RichPowers 3 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Speed Limit 17.3mph

    By RichPowers 5 days ago

  • ArtisanRadio

    Artisan Radio Pivots Again

    By ArtisanRadio 5 days ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • Carrier Current1
View all tags (74)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×